Skip to main content

Cloud Modernisation on AWS

Cloud Modernisation on AWS

AWS suits organisations that want strong separation between business units, environments or acquired entities, because the multi-account model makes that boundary the default rather than an afterthought. We establish the account foundation with AWS Control Tower and AWS Organizations first, then migrate in waves. Each workload moves only as far as its business case justifies, from a rehosted instance through to containers or functions.

Why AWS

When this is the right platform.

  • The multi-account model gives every environment and business unit a hard boundary for identity, network and cost, which is valuable where separate entities, acquisitions or client-facing workloads must not share a blast radius.
  • The compute range is unusually granular, from Amazon EC2 through Amazon ECS and AWS Fargate to AWS Lambda and AWS App Runner, so a workload can be moved one step rather than being forced into a full rewrite to see any benefit.
  • AWS Application Migration Service replicates at block level and supports repeated test cut-overs, so a rehost can be rehearsed as many times as the application owners need before the real window.
  • Teams already working with Linux, open-source databases and Terraform tend to be productive quickly, which reduces how long the platform depends on external support.
  • Amazon Aurora gives MySQL and PostgreSQL workloads managed storage, backup and failover without changing database engine, which keeps the application change small while removing most of the administration.

Where it is less suited

We would rather say this now than after a migration.

  • The multi-account model is the right default, but every account adds identity, logging, network and cost-allocation work. Without automated account vending the account count outgrows the team that has to look after it, so we build the vending process before the accounts, not after.
  • Cost tooling reports accurately, yet AWS cannot group spend by business unit unless the account structure and tagging were designed for it. Retrofitting that across an existing estate is manual, so the reporting model needs to be agreed during assessment.
  • Charges for data transfer between availability zones, between regions and out to the internet are easy to under-model. Applications lifted unchanged from a flat on-premises network are the common case, and they need traffic modelling before the business case is signed rather than after the first invoice.
  • Windows and commercial database workloads run well on AWS, but licence terms shape instance sizing and dedicated host decisions. That review belongs inside the migration assessment, because discovering it later can change the run cost of an entire wave.

Business outcomes

What AWS delivers here.

Account structure that contains a mistake
Platform and security teams get workloads separated into accounts by environment and business function, so a misconfiguration or compromised credential is bounded rather than tenant-wide. Time to provision a new compliant account is measured before and after the landing zone is in place.
Rehearsed cut-overs instead of hopeful ones
Application owners test their own systems in the target environment before the production window, using replicated data and a rollback that stays available. The measure agreed at the outset is how many test cut-overs each wave completes before sign-off.
Servers replaced by services where it pays
Engineering teams stop patching instances for workloads that fit managed containers, functions or databases, which returns operational hours to product work. The proportion of workloads still requiring instance-level maintenance is tracked as a modernisation measure.
Recovery matched to what the business will tolerate
Risk and operations get backup and replication configured per workload against agreed recovery objectives, then exercised with the result documented. Success is a tested recovery time that meets the objective, not the existence of a plan.
Spend that reconciles to the business
Finance gets cost split by account, business unit and application because the account structure and tagging were designed for that reporting. Budget variance is reviewed monthly with the driver of each movement identified.

Common client problems

What we usually hear first.

  • We have accounts that were created by different people over the years and no idea what governs them.

    We bring the existing accounts into an AWS Organizations structure with organisational units that reflect environment and business function, then apply guardrails through AWS Control Tower and service control policies. Accounts that cannot be brought into line immediately get a documented exception with an owner and a date.

  • Our data centre contract ends in ten months and we still have physical servers running.

    We assess the estate through AWS Migration Hub, group workloads into waves by dependency, and replicate with AWS Application Migration Service so each wave can be tested repeatedly before its window. The contract end date becomes the plan's backstop, with modernisation of individual workloads scheduled after the move rather than blocking it.

  • We run Kubernetes because someone set it up, and now nobody wants to own the upgrades.

    We review each workload on the cluster against what it actually needs, and move the ones that only need a container runtime onto AWS Fargate or AWS App Runner. Amazon EKS stays for workloads that genuinely use Kubernetes features, with a documented upgrade cadence and an owner.

  • The first month's AWS bill was much higher than the estimate we built the case on.

    Data transfer between availability zones and out to the internet is the usual cause when a flat on-premises network is lifted unchanged. We model the traffic pattern, adjust placement and endpoint design, then set AWS Budgets alerts and a monthly AWS Cost Explorer review so a variance is caught in week one instead of at quarter end.

  • Our SQL Server and Windows workloads are quoted very differently depending on who we ask.

    We put licensing into the assessment rather than leaving it to the end, covering instance sizing, dedicated host options and where an engine change to Amazon Aurora removes the licence entirely. You get the run cost of each option side by side, with the licensing assumption behind it written down.

How we deliver

Our AWS delivery approach.

  1. 01

    Assessment and advisory

    The AWS assessment produces two things: a wave plan the delivery team can execute, and a cost model finance can hold us to. Both are built from observed behaviour rather than from the specification of the current hardware.

    • Discovery and dependency analysis consolidated in AWS Migration Hub, reconciled with interviews so undocumented integrations surface before a wave is planned.
    • Account and organisational unit design workshop covering environment separation, shared services, logging and how new accounts will be requested and approved.
    • Right-sizing from observed utilisation, with instance family, purchase option and storage class choices priced against the current hosting and support cost.
    • Data transfer modelling for chatty applications, so cross-zone and egress charges appear in the business case rather than in the first invoice.
    • Licensing review for Windows and commercial database workloads, including where a move to Amazon Aurora or Amazon RDS changes the licence position.
    • Recovery objectives agreed per workload and translated into an AWS Backup policy and, where warranted, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery replication.
  2. 02

    Architecture and implementation

    We build the account foundation, network and guardrails before workloads land, then migrate in waves that each end in a verifiable state. Modernisation of individual applications is sequenced after the move unless the business case demands otherwise.

    • Landing zone established with AWS Control Tower and AWS Organizations, including organisational units, service control policies, centralised logging and a repeatable account vending process.
    • Amazon VPC design with segmented subnets, controlled egress, interface endpoints for platform services and connectivity through AWS Direct Connect or VPN, tested against the applications that will cross it.
    • Rehost waves delivered with AWS Application Migration Service, using test cut-overs into an isolated subnet so owners validate their systems with real data before the production window.
    • Replatforming onto Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate, AWS App Runner or AWS Lambda based on request pattern, runtime support and the team's operating capability, with the choice documented per workload.
    • Database migration to Amazon RDS, Amazon Aurora or Amazon DynamoDB, including engine compatibility assessment, performance baselining and a rehearsed cut-over with a validation step.
    • Traffic entry standardised through Elastic Load Balancing and Amazon CloudFront so certificates, health checks and caching behaviour are consistent rather than configured per application.
  3. 03

    Security and governance

    Guardrails go into the organisation before workloads arrive, so a new account starts compliant instead of being remediated later. Controls are preventive where the risk warrants it and detective everywhere else.

    • Service control policies at organisational unit level restricting regions, denying disablement of logging, and blocking resource types the organisation has decided not to run.
    • Centralised logging and configuration recording, with AWS Config rules evaluating drift and non-compliant resources reported to a named owner rather than to a shared inbox.
    • Least-privilege role design with federated sign-in, no long-lived access keys for human users, and permission boundaries on roles that teams can create themselves.
    • Encryption enforced for storage, databases and backups with customer-managed keys where key control is a requirement, and key usage logged.
    • Network exposure review covering security groups, public subnets, load balancer listeners and object storage access, repeated as a check at the end of each migration wave.
    • Control mapping showing how the deployed AWS configuration supports the Essential Eight or ISO 27001 controls you are working towards, and which gaps remain process responsibilities.
  4. 04

    Adoption and enablement

    The account model only works if your team can operate it, including creating the next account correctly. Enablement is built around what they will do in the first months after go-live.

    • An account request and vending runbook covering naming, organisational unit placement, baseline guardrails, budget setup and who approves each step.
    • Hands-on sessions in the real environment covering restore from AWS Backup, a failover rehearsal, scaling an Amazon ECS service and interpreting an Amazon CloudWatch alarm back to a cause.
    • Cost ownership handover using AWS Cost Explorer views and AWS Budgets scoped per team, so each owner sees only their own spend and its trend.
    • Documented escalation paths separating platform issues, application issues and AWS support cases, with the diagnostic detail required for each.
    • A joint dry run of the first post-migration change, executed by your engineers while we observe, followed by a review of what the runbooks missed.
    • Source environment decommissioning checklist covering data retention, contract termination dates, backup retention and the sign-off required before equipment is released.
  5. 05

    Managed service continuation

    After migration we can keep running the AWS platform with you under an agreed service schedule, maintaining the guardrails, resilience testing and cost discipline once the project team has stood down.

    • Amazon CloudWatch alarm tuning and triage, with coverage extended as workloads change and noisy alarms retired rather than muted.
    • AWS Config compliance reporting covering drift, newly non-compliant resources and guardrail exceptions approaching their agreed expiry.
    • Scheduled restore tests from AWS Backup and periodic AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery failover rehearsals, with the result and any remediation recorded.
    • Monthly cost review using AWS Cost Explorer and AWS Budgets, covering spend by account and tag, commitment coverage, idle resources and specific right-sizing actions with the saving quantified.
    • Patch and image currency management for Amazon EC2 instances, container base images and managed engine versions against an approved maintenance calendar.
    • A prioritised improvement backlog covering resilience gaps, cost actions and workloads still worth moving off instances.

Technology reference

The AWS services we build with.

A reference architecture view of the platform services used in this domain, and what each one does in the design.

Account foundation and migration

  • AWS Control TowerLanding zone setup, guardrail management and repeatable account vending so new accounts start compliant.
  • AWS OrganizationsOrganisational unit structure, service control policies and consolidated billing aligned to how the business reports.
  • AWS Migration HubSingle view of discovery, dependency data and migration progress across waves and application owners.
  • AWS Application Migration ServiceBlock-level replication and repeatable test cut-overs for rehosted servers, with a rollback position held until sign-off.

Compute and application runtime

  • Amazon EC2Target for workloads that must stay at instance level, right-sized from observed utilisation and covered by a patching cadence.
  • Amazon ECSContainer orchestration for teams that want scheduled containers without operating Kubernetes.
  • Amazon EKSKubernetes platform for workloads that genuinely use Kubernetes features, with a documented upgrade cadence and named owner.
  • AWS FargateServerless container compute that removes node patching and capacity planning from container workloads.
  • AWS LambdaEvent-driven and scheduled processing, replacing cron jobs and small always-on services that no longer justify an instance.
  • AWS App RunnerDirect hosting for containerised web services and APIs where the team wants a deployment path without infrastructure to manage.

Data platform

  • Amazon RDSManaged relational hosting for migrated databases, removing patching, backup and failover administration from application teams.
  • Amazon AuroraTarget for MySQL and PostgreSQL workloads needing managed storage, faster failover and read scaling without an engine change.
  • Amazon DynamoDBUsed where the access pattern is key-based at high volume and a relational model adds cost without adding value.

Network and content delivery

  • Amazon VPCSegmented network design with controlled egress, interface endpoints for platform services and separation between environments.
  • AWS Direct ConnectPrivate connectivity from the data centre or office where bandwidth, latency or predictability rule out internet VPN.
  • Elastic Load BalancingConsistent entry point for applications, with health checks, target group routing and certificate management handled centrally.
  • Amazon CloudFrontEdge delivery and caching for public sites and APIs, reducing origin load and shortening response times for distributed users.

Resilience, observability and cost

  • AWS BackupPolicy-driven backup across instances, databases and file systems, with protection coverage reported rather than assumed.
  • AWS Elastic Disaster RecoveryReplication and orchestrated recovery for workloads whose objectives cannot be met by restore alone, rehearsed on a schedule.
  • Amazon CloudWatchMetrics, logs, dashboards and alarms, with baseline monitoring applied at account creation so new workloads are observable by default.
  • AWS ConfigConfiguration recording and rule-based drift detection, giving evidence of what changed, when and by whom.
  • AWS Cost ExplorerSpend analysis by account, tag and service, used for right-sizing decisions and commitment coverage review.
  • AWS BudgetsBudget thresholds and alerts per team and environment, so a cost movement is raised in week one rather than at quarter end.

Product names and icons are trademarks of Microsoft and Amazon Web Services, reproduced unmodified from their official architecture icon libraries to identify the technologies used in these architectures. Their presence does not indicate partnership, certification or endorsement by either vendor.

Related industries

Where this work has the most leverage.

  • Logistics and Warehousing

    Shipment and document automation, proof-of-delivery processing and exception dashboards that let a small team run a large network.

  • Manufacturing and Distribution

    Demand and inventory intelligence, production analytics and supplier automation built on data your planners already trust.

  • Professional Services

    Governed enterprise search, document intelligence and secure copilots that respect matter confidentiality and conflict boundaries.

Free discovery workshop

Start with a cloud modernisation discovery workshop.

Bring one challenge. We will assess whether AWS is the right platform for it before recommending anything.