Skip to main content

Managed Services on Microsoft Azure

Managed services on Microsoft Azure

Running Azure well is mostly a question of using what is already in the platform properly. Azure Monitor, Azure Policy, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Azure Cost Management cover most of what an operations team needs, and the usual problem is that they were switched on with default settings and never tuned. We configure them against your actual workloads and then run the environment from the signals they produce.

Why Azure

When this is the right platform.

  • If your organisation already runs Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Entra ID, operations inherit a single identity plane. Conditional access, privileged role management and access reviews then apply to the cloud estate and the productivity estate together.
  • Azure Monitor and Log Analytics consolidate infrastructure metrics, application traces and platform logs into queryable workspaces, so an investigation can start in one place instead of three consoles.
  • Azure Policy expresses guardrails as code at management-group scope, which means drift can be denied or remediated automatically rather than found months later in a review.
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud scores posture across subscriptions, and its alerts and exported recommendations land in the same Log Analytics workspace Microsoft Sentinel reads, so posture management and detection share one evidence trail.
  • Teams with Windows Server, SQL Server and Active Directory backgrounds transfer their skills quickly, and Azure Arc extends the same monitoring, policy and update management to servers that have not moved yet.

Where it is less suited

We would rather say this now than after a migration.

  • Azure Monitor and Log Analytics cost is driven by ingestion and retention. Verbose diagnostic settings left at their defaults can make observability one of the larger lines on the invoice, so table plans, sampling and retention have to be set per source rather than globally.
  • Cost attribution across Enterprise Agreement, CSP and pay-as-you-go billing, with reservations and savings plans layered on top, is genuinely fiddly. A clean management-group and tagging model is a prerequisite, and retrofitting tags to an established estate takes real effort before the reporting becomes reliable.
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud plans are enabled per resource type and priced separately, and secure score on its own does not tell you whether a finding matters to your business. Triage rules and an agreed severity model are needed before the output becomes useful.
  • Microsoft renames and repackages products more often than most vendors. Runbooks, dashboards and documentation need a scheduled review, or they quietly describe a console that no longer exists.

Business outcomes

What Azure delivers here.

Observability you can afford
Platform owners get diagnostic coverage on the workloads that matter, with ingestion, table plan and retention chosen source by source. Coverage and its cost are reported together each month, so the trade-off stays a visible decision.
Guardrails that actually hold
Governance leads see policy compliance by management group instead of a spreadsheet of intentions. Non-compliant resources are remediated or exempted against a named owner and a review date, and the count is tracked month to month.
Posture progress you can show a board
The security lead receives a movement view from Microsoft Defender for Cloud each month: findings closed, findings accepted and findings newly raised, with the business reason recorded for anything accepted.
Spend attributed to the people who caused it
Finance gets Azure Cost Management data mapped to applications and owners through subscription structure and enforced tagging. Reservation and savings plan coverage is reviewed ahead of renewal dates rather than after them.
Restores that have been proven
Continuity owners get results from real Azure Backup restore tests against the recovery objectives agreed per workload, including which workloads met the objective and which would need investment to do so.

Common client problems

What we usually hear first.

  • We turned on Azure Monitor and now our log bill is one of the biggest lines on the invoice.

    We review diagnostic settings source by source, move high-volume, rarely queried data to cheaper table plans or storage, and set retention per table rather than per workspace. Coverage that genuinely matters is kept, and we show you what each decision saves.

  • We have policies in Azure Policy but half the estate is non-compliant and nobody chases it.

    We split the policy set into what should deny, what should audit and what should remediate automatically, then retire the rules nobody intends to enforce. Remaining non-compliance is assigned to an owner with a date instead of sitting on a dashboard.

  • Defender for Cloud gives us a secure score and I have no idea whether it matters.

    Recommendations are translated into a ranked list based on exposure, data sensitivity and how hard each issue would be to exploit in your configuration. Secure score becomes one input to that conversation rather than the target itself.

  • Every subscription was created by a different person and almost nothing is tagged.

    We agree a management-group and subscription model, enforce tagging through policy so new resources cannot be created untagged, and backfill existing resources in prioritised batches. Cost reporting then works without a manual reconciliation every month.

  • Our Fabric and Power BI refreshes fail quietly and the business finds out first.

    Pipeline and semantic model refresh outcomes are monitored as first-class alerts with named owners, and failure causes are recorded so repeat offenders get fixed rather than rerun. Where a refresh window is genuinely too tight, we bring the capacity or design change needed to fix it.

How we deliver

Our Azure delivery approach.

  1. 01

    Azure estate assessment and transition

    We start from what is actually deployed in your tenant, not from the architecture diagram. The assessment produces a costed transition plan, a remediation list and an explicit acceptance point.

    • Inventory management groups, subscriptions, resource groups and workloads using Azure Resource Graph queries that we hand over, so the inventory can be refreshed rather than rebuilt.
    • Review Azure Monitor diagnostic settings, Log Analytics workspace design, retention and current ingestion volume per source.
    • Check Azure Backup policy coverage against each workload and identify anything with no backup, no tested restore or a recovery objective the current policy cannot meet.
    • Assess Microsoft Defender for Cloud plan coverage by resource type, and record the existing recommendation and alert backlog as the baseline for later reporting.
    • Baseline Azure Cost Management data by subscription, tag and service, including reservation and savings plan coverage and the dates each commitment expires.
    • Review Microsoft Entra ID privileged role assignments, standing access and service principal credentials, flagging anything unsafe to operate as found.
  2. 02

    Operating platform on Azure

    Platform tooling is configured deliberately and kept in code, so the operating model survives reorganisation and staff turnover. Everything we build here is handed over, not held privately.

    • Design Log Analytics workspace layout, table plans, retention and data collection rules against real query patterns and the cost each source generates.
    • Instrument applications with Application Insights, including availability tests and dependency tracking on the transactions the business would notice failing.
    • Author Azure Monitor alert rules with action groups, severity and a linked runbook, using dynamic thresholds where a fixed number produces false alarms.
    • Deploy Azure Policy initiatives at management-group scope, using modify remediation for tagging and deployIfNotExists for diagnostic settings and baseline configuration.
    • Configure Azure Backup vaults, policies and immutability settings per workload class, aligned to the recovery objective agreed with each workload owner.
    • Onboard servers and clusters outside Azure through Azure Arc, so monitoring, policy and update management cover the whole estate rather than only the migrated part.
  3. 03

    Security operations on Azure

    Posture management and detection run from the same data, so what your security team reads each month is evidence rather than assertion. Escalation steps are agreed before they are needed.

    • Review Microsoft Defender for Cloud recommendations on a set cadence, tracking each to closed, accepted against a named owner and review date, or scheduled as funded work.
    • Operate Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules and watchlists tuned to your environment, retiring rules that generate alerts nobody investigates.
    • Run Microsoft Entra ID access reviews across privileged roles, guest accounts and application registrations, replacing standing access with eligible assignment where the role allows it.
    • Monitor Azure Key Vault secret, key and certificate expiry, rotating on a schedule agreed with each application owner rather than at the point of outage.
    • Track update compliance and vulnerability findings per workload, holding exceptions against a named owner instead of leaving them implicit.
    • Produce operational evidence supporting your alignment to frameworks such as the Essential Eight; assessment and certification remain with an accredited third party.
  4. 04

    Enabling your Azure team

    Tooling is only useful if your people can read it. We hand over the workbooks, queries and runbooks and teach the team to use them, so dependence on us reduces over time.

    • Publish Azure Monitor workbooks and saved KQL queries in your tenant, so your engineers can answer routine questions without contacting us.
    • Store runbooks and infrastructure code in your Azure DevOps or GitHub organisation, updated as part of each change rather than in a separate documentation exercise.
    • Run a monthly service review with the platform owner and business sponsor covering incidents, changes, policy compliance, posture movement and cost.
    • Train your service desk on first-line triage for the alerts they will actually see, including what to escalate immediately and what to observe.
    • Give finance a Cost Management view they can open themselves, with budgets and anomaly alerts set to thresholds they choose.
  5. 05

    The ongoing Azure service

    What runs every month once the environment is under management. Coverage hours, contact channels and escalation steps are set out in your service schedule rather than assumed.

    • Monitor workload health, availability tests and pipeline runs through Azure Monitor and Application Insights, acting on alerts under the arrangements in your service schedule.
    • Coordinate incidents including Microsoft support case management, stakeholder updates and a written review for significant events.
    • Apply patching and update rings through Azure Update Manager inside your change process, with maintenance windows agreed per workload.
    • Run Azure Backup restore tests on the agreed schedule and report what each test proved, including any workload the test could not cover.
    • Review Azure Cost Management data monthly, investigating anomalies, identifying idle resources and checking commitment coverage before renewal dates.
    • Maintain an improvement backlog spanning policy gaps, posture findings, resilience shortfalls and cost actions, ranked by business value.

Technology reference

The Microsoft Azure services we build with.

A reference architecture view of the platform services used in this domain, and what each one does in the design.

Monitoring and diagnostics

  • Azure MonitorMetric, log and alert backbone for the estate. We design workspace layout, data collection rules and alert routing, then run the environment from what it reports.
  • Application InsightsApplication-level tracing, dependency mapping and availability tests on the transactions the business would notice failing.
  • Azure ArcExtends monitoring, policy and update management to servers and Kubernetes clusters outside Azure, so one operating model covers the whole estate.

Governance, identity and cost

  • Azure PolicyGuardrails as code at management-group scope. We use it to enforce tagging, diagnostic settings and baseline configuration, and to remediate drift automatically where that is safe.
  • Azure Cost ManagementSpend attribution by subscription, tag and service, plus budgets, anomaly alerts and commitment coverage tracked ahead of renewal dates.
  • Microsoft Entra IDThe identity plane the service runs against. We operate access reviews, privileged role governance and service principal credential hygiene here.

Security posture and detection

  • Microsoft Defender for CloudPosture management across subscriptions. We triage its recommendations on a set cadence and track every finding to closed, accepted or scheduled.
  • Microsoft SentinelDetection and investigation over the same Log Analytics data, with analytics rules tuned to your environment and escalation agreed in advance.
  • Azure Key VaultCentral store for secrets, keys and certificates. We monitor expiry and run rotation on a schedule agreed with each application owner.

Backup and resilience

  • Azure BackupBackup policy, vault configuration and immutability per workload class, plus the scheduled restore tests that prove the policy actually works.
  • Azure Site RecoveryReplication and failover for workloads whose recovery objective cannot be met by backup alone, exercised through planned failover tests.

Data and AI operations

  • Microsoft FabricWhere analytics workloads run. We monitor capacity use, refresh outcomes and queue behaviour so reporting arrives on time.
  • Fabric Data FactoryPipeline orchestration we operate day to day, covering run monitoring, retry behaviour and a named owner per pipeline.
  • Microsoft FoundryWhere deployed AI applications are monitored. We track usage, latency, cost per workload and response quality against an evaluation set your experts review.
  • Microsoft PurviewCatalogue and sensitivity labelling we keep current, so classification does not decay in the months after the initial rollout.

Product names and icons are trademarks of Microsoft and Amazon Web Services, reproduced unmodified from their official architecture icon libraries to identify the technologies used in these architectures. Their presence does not indicate partnership, certification or endorsement by either vendor.

Related industries

Where this work has the most leverage.

  • Professional Services

    Governed enterprise search, document intelligence and secure copilots that respect matter confidentiality and conflict boundaries.

  • Manufacturing and Distribution

    Demand and inventory intelligence, production analytics and supplier automation built on data your planners already trust.

  • Construction and Property

    Tender intelligence, addenda tracking and project reporting that keep estimators and contract administrators ahead of the documents instead of buried in them.

Free discovery workshop

Start with a managed services discovery workshop.

Bring one challenge. We will assess whether Microsoft Azure is the right platform for it before recommending anything.